California Mortgage Lender Accused of Anti-LGBTQ+ Practices

San Francisco – A major West Coast mortgage lender is under federal investigation following accusations that it systematically denied both mortgage and refinance applications in historically LGBTQ+ neighborhoods throughout San Francisco. Internal records and whistleblower testimony suggest the company engaged in a covert form of redlining, a discriminatory practice long prohibited under federal law.

Redlining refers to the practice of refusing financial services, particularly home loans, to individuals based on their neighborhood’s racial, ethnic, or social identity rather than the applicant’s financial qualifications. Though common in the early to mid-20th century, it is now illegal under the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, which require lenders to base decisions solely on legitimate financial factors such as income, creditworthiness, and debt obligations.

Former employees of the lender, identified in public records as Pacific Crest Lending, say the company maintained an unspoken policy of denying loan applications originating from ZIP codes associated with LGBTQ+ communities, especially the Castro, Noe Valley, and Mission Dolores.

“We were told to stay out of the Castro,” said a former loan officer who worked at the lender for four years. “That was the exact phrase. At first, they talked about avoiding ‘high-risk districts,’ but eventually, it became clear they meant gay neighborhoods. One executive said, ‘We can’t extend long-term credit in areas where values might shift with lifestyle changes.’ It was always coded, but the intent was unmistakable.”

Another former compliance analyst recalled, “Loan and refinance applications from those areas were scrutinized differently. We used terms like ‘asset inconsistency’ or ‘neighborhood instability’ to justify rejections. These weren’t official policies, but everyone knew how to apply them.”

Pacific Crest Lending, once celebrated for its tech-forward approach and inclusive advertising, had cultivated a brand that appealed to progressive and diverse homebuyers. Its commercials often featured same-sex couples, rainbow flags, and messaging centered on community equity and belonging.

“It’s a gut punch,” said Alex Romero, a Castro resident whose mortgage application was denied in 2022. “They ran ads during Pride. They talked about ‘celebrating all families.’ But behind closed doors, they were redlining us like it was 1950.” Romero is now a plaintiff in one of several lawsuits alleging discrimination based on sexual orientation.

Other borrowers, including those seeking to refinance existing mortgages, reported similar treatment. “I had excellent credit, a stable income, and decades in the same profession,” said Jordan Bellamy, another Castro resident. “They told me I didn’t meet their lending criteria. No one could explain why. I now understand it had nothing to do with me and everything to do with where I live.”

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) have confirmed ongoing investigations into the company’s lending practices. A CFPB spokesperson stated, “Mortgage and refinance discrimination is illegal, period. We are reviewing documentation and whistleblower evidence. If violations are found, those responsible will be held accountable.”

Under federal statutes, companies found guilty of housing discrimination can face civil penalties including fines up to $25,000 per offense for first-time violations, and up to $100,000 for repeat offenses. Victims may be entitled to damages, both compensatory and punitive, as well as reimbursement of legal fees. In serious cases involving willful misconduct, executives and staff may face criminal charges, including conspiracy or obstruction, which could result in additional fines and potential prison time.

Multiple class-action lawsuits have already been filed against Pacific Crest Lending, and legal experts anticipate more to follow. Housing rights organizations are calling the case one of the most egregious examples of discriminatory lending in recent years.

If you believe you were unfairly denied a mortgage or refinance, especially if you live in or were seeking to purchase a home in a historically LGBTQ+ neighborhood, you are encouraged to file a complaint with the CFPB at http://www.consumerfinance.gov. Legal aid organizations and fair housing advocates can also help you understand your rights.

Leave a comment